Conducting Virtual Focus Groups During the COVID-19 Epidemic Utilizing Videoconferencing Technology: A Feasibility Study.

Background Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the world has seen a surge in utilizing videoconferencing technology. It can be a useful approach for qualitative research. This study describes the feasibility of virtual focus groups in qualitative research. Methods Videoconferencing software was used to conduct virtual focus groups. A dry run was conducted a day before the focus group to ensure the research team was acquainted with the software on the focus group day. Results Using distance videoconferencing software was cost-effective compared to face-to-face focus groups. The moderator was responsible for leading the discussion virtually. Unlike in-person focus groups, the virtual focus group scheduling was flexible, and it was easier to find replacements for participants who dropped out. Conclusion This study found that conducting virtual focus groups utilizing videoconferencing software was time-saving and cost-efficient compared to face-to-face focus groups.

The Effect of Implementing COVID-19 Infection Control Precautions on Conducting Simulation-Based Training Activities.

Introduction Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, onsite simulation training required infection control precautions. This study aimed to investigate the effect of implementing the infection control protocol on the participants' evaluation of simulation activities. Materials and methods The study included undergraduate female students from healthcare colleges in Princess Nourah University (PNU) who have attended simulation training events in the simulation and skills development center (SSDC). The study design was a cohort retrospective where data were retrieved from the SSDC participant evaluation database. The data included information related to participants' characteristics, simulation activities type, and learners' evaluation. The simulation activities included in the study were procedural simulation (PS) and full simulation (FS). Results The study included 837 subjects that were randomly chosen from January 2019 to December 2021. All participant's evaluations of simulation events conducted in the SSDC during the specified period were reviewed and randomly selected to be included in the study. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the activities were conducted under infection control protocol measures. There was a significant difference in evaluation results of FS and PS activities before and after implementing the COVID-19 infection control protocol (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion The study showed that conducting simulation activities in a simulation center under the infection control protocol does not negatively affect participants' evaluation of simulation events.